Clearly, the leadership of UA has done nothing to distinguish itself and, overall, the press coverage of the financial issues at UA has been good. However, you would be doing your readers a disservice not to examine the agendas of the faculty representatives at UA. As we have seen, and are seeing, on virtually every major campus across t…
Clearly, the leadership of UA has done nothing to distinguish itself and, overall, the press coverage of the financial issues at UA has been good. However, you would be doing your readers a disservice not to examine the agendas of the faculty representatives at UA. As we have seen, and are seeing, on virtually every major campus across the country, faculty bias has been a major factor (arguably the biggest factor) in the degradation of higher education across the board. I would like to see in-depth coverage that examines whether the proposals advanced by every interest group involved are primarily focused on the welfare of the university and its present and future students. Put another way, I would hate to see UA jump from the frying pan into the fire.
Clearly, the leadership of UA has done nothing to distinguish itself and, overall, the press coverage of the financial issues at UA has been good. However, you would be doing your readers a disservice not to examine the agendas of the faculty representatives at UA. As we have seen, and are seeing, on virtually every major campus across the country, faculty bias has been a major factor (arguably the biggest factor) in the degradation of higher education across the board. I would like to see in-depth coverage that examines whether the proposals advanced by every interest group involved are primarily focused on the welfare of the university and its present and future students. Put another way, I would hate to see UA jump from the frying pan into the fire.