7 Comments
User's avatar
Britney G's avatar

Do we vote for the “maddest” in each match up or who we think is a better legislator? Love this idea btw

Expand full comment
Hank Stephenson's avatar

I’m going with maddest in my first round selections yall can do it however but I’m hoping Wendy wins the whole thing.

Expand full comment
Me's avatar

I shall call for the audit of the results.

Expand full comment
Betts* Putnam-Hidalgo's avatar

I dont agree that Gen z is not interested in politics— they are not interested in ELECTORAL politics because its unrepresentative. Its not on Gen Z, its on electoral politics! Come on dems, stop smothering youth voices calling for a livable planet in the future free of genocide and war and start representing them!

Expand full comment
Morgan's avatar

I started to pick politicians in your game, but then I realized that I was unclear about the aim. Should I pick out the ones I prefer as legislators etc, or pick the ones I want to be elected (not necessarily the same), or pick out the ones I think will win? What was your concept?

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

I was initially excited to play March Madness - The AZ Legislature Edition. Then when I began to go down the list - YIKES!! Rogers or Bolick? Petersen or Borelli? Toma or Gress? Kavanagh or Wadsack? Sorry, I can't bring myself to vote for ANY of them, even in a game like this. Good luck to everyone, but as Cosmo Kramer once famously said - "I'M OUT!!". :0)

Expand full comment
Kathleen Edelman's avatar

WaPo did a scary article about a month ago about preparations SoS Fontes is making to protect poll workers.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/09/election-worker-voting-preparation/

How about some follow up on how this is shaking out?

Expand full comment