Hey Az Agenda! Glad to have you back in my inbox after your vacation! My question is why the new fascination with AI? I don’t expect you all to be “woke” or politically correct (especially given some of your more famous legislative readers) but i would appreciate hearing substantive arguments for why anyone would want to pay for the kind…
Hey Az Agenda! Glad to have you back in my inbox after your vacation! My question is why the new fascination with AI? I don’t expect you all to be “woke” or politically correct (especially given some of your more famous legislative readers) but i would appreciate hearing substantive arguments for why anyone would want to pay for the kind of bland and often meaningless stuff that AI produces at the cost of real writers livelihoods, grotesque environmental damage and honest and far-reaching critical thought. To say i am disappointed is an understatement.
Actually, having just read a piece I i think I missed the first time around, “ is chat gpt running for office” i think you have written substantive pieces on the value of AI. And i couldn’t be happier about your hiring new writers. Just as i was sorry that the artwork earlier editions produced came from your chat gpt intern instead of an artists’ creativity, i am not fired up about AI generated ANYthing, really. Call it an appreciation for burstiness or sentences that go where you don’t expect them to ( like the best of human thought in my estimation), I am just not an AI fan. Unless i find that Hank’s snark gets ironed out of the Agenda, though, my subscriber dollars will not go elsewhere.
Hey Az Agenda! Glad to have you back in my inbox after your vacation! My question is why the new fascination with AI? I don’t expect you all to be “woke” or politically correct (especially given some of your more famous legislative readers) but i would appreciate hearing substantive arguments for why anyone would want to pay for the kind of bland and often meaningless stuff that AI produces at the cost of real writers livelihoods, grotesque environmental damage and honest and far-reaching critical thought. To say i am disappointed is an understatement.
Not sure what you mean by “the stuff that AI produces”. The writing staff has just expanded, and they’re all humans.
Actually, having just read a piece I i think I missed the first time around, “ is chat gpt running for office” i think you have written substantive pieces on the value of AI. And i couldn’t be happier about your hiring new writers. Just as i was sorry that the artwork earlier editions produced came from your chat gpt intern instead of an artists’ creativity, i am not fired up about AI generated ANYthing, really. Call it an appreciation for burstiness or sentences that go where you don’t expect them to ( like the best of human thought in my estimation), I am just not an AI fan. Unless i find that Hank’s snark gets ironed out of the Agenda, though, my subscriber dollars will not go elsewhere.