You guys really are a great way to start the day! Everyone is wondering about prop 414 and i appreciate you pairing it with the TEP proposition to show how off base our politicians are. Partially we elect them because they are a part of a tight and powerful political machine that is very hard to break through and their historical opposit…
You guys really are a great way to start the day! Everyone is wondering about prop 414 and i appreciate you pairing it with the TEP proposition to show how off base our politicians are. Partially we elect them because they are a part of a tight and powerful political machine that is very hard to break through and their historical opposition has its own problems. Partially 414 bombed through bad timing-- kitchentable economic issues that they did not foresee ( where do THEY eat breakfast one wonders?!). But mostly your circle chart shows it all. People said homelessness, they said cops. Turning Pt can take all the credit they want but i believe it was the other NO crowd that pulled it down. You know, those people who get systematically politically marginalized and whose solutions are ignored because they believe in feeding people. Proposing more surveillance in the age of the Great Deportation was just untenable to a broad spectrum of us.
And as for the laughter you could add in the example of protesters who showed up for months on end in front of our council demanding a resolution for a ceasefire in palestine ( in a raytheon town mind you so yes it WAS city business) and basically being told " lets stop this discussion-- its too controversial and people won't like us if we vote on it" is neither an appropriate, professional or even politically savvy way to end calls to the audience.
You guys really are a great way to start the day! Everyone is wondering about prop 414 and i appreciate you pairing it with the TEP proposition to show how off base our politicians are. Partially we elect them because they are a part of a tight and powerful political machine that is very hard to break through and their historical opposition has its own problems. Partially 414 bombed through bad timing-- kitchentable economic issues that they did not foresee ( where do THEY eat breakfast one wonders?!). But mostly your circle chart shows it all. People said homelessness, they said cops. Turning Pt can take all the credit they want but i believe it was the other NO crowd that pulled it down. You know, those people who get systematically politically marginalized and whose solutions are ignored because they believe in feeding people. Proposing more surveillance in the age of the Great Deportation was just untenable to a broad spectrum of us.
And as for the laughter you could add in the example of protesters who showed up for months on end in front of our council demanding a resolution for a ceasefire in palestine ( in a raytheon town mind you so yes it WAS city business) and basically being told " lets stop this discussion-- its too controversial and people won't like us if we vote on it" is neither an appropriate, professional or even politically savvy way to end calls to the audience.